8/9/2008-Saturday.

Thank you Jersey City police officers, Kang (badge # 2743) and Rivera
(badge # 2726).

They stood in my apartment where Mr. Pagnozzi testified he stood in 2003, when he changed my locks after my room-mate, Rosenheim moved out.

I asked them, officers, Mr. Pagnozzi testified that he changed my locks in 2003, if you were standing here, changing my locks, isn't it impossible not to notice that a wall was missing. They agreed.

[Note: Apparently, my landlords are trying to excuse their harassment by claiming greed. They did not care about money.

In June 2007, Melissa Bastos, and Angel Quinones rent increase was $ 0, Kenneth Kim's rent increase was $50, my rent increase was $300. The numbers speak for themselves.

Melissa Bastos, and Angel Quinones came to court on 9/10/2007. My landlords gave them retaliatory rent increases, and other restrictions AFTER they came to court. ]



In landlord-tenant court, docket number: LT-3443-08, Ralph Pagnozzi testified that in 2003 after Asaf Rosenheim moved out of my apartment, he entered my apartment by four feet to change the locks.

The posted photograph (see the 2 foot-marker) shows that in 2003 while changing the locks, Mr. Pagnozzi could not have missed seeing a wall that had been removed.

Please note especially that my door opens inward. Mr. Pagnozzi could not have changed the locks unless he entered my apartment, as he testified.

Click on the photograph to engage it, to return to reading the blog, click on your Internet browser's "Back" button".

Mr. Pagnozzi and his attorneys are attempting to create a fiction
(coming up from Mr. Rosenheim's letters) that Asaf Roseheim left my apartment in good condition, and that after he moved out I removed a wall, causing damage to the apartment.

[The Pagnozzis' building is not damaged. It is DETERIORATING because they do not do the repairs and upkeep. I will post photographs, and you can see for yourself].

Mr. Pagnozzi, assisted by his attorneys, are engaged in a criminal scheme to "milk" me of money, and falsely label me as a criminal.

There are a number of witnesses and physical evidence that demonstrate this dividing wall was not present when I moved in 2003, in addition to Mr. Pagnozzi's testimony.

How did the Pagnozzzis and their attorney get past probable cause? Why didn't the prosecutor at the municipal court have a meaningful conversation with me?

The Housing Inspectors have already inspected my apartment twice. They know the Pagnozzis and their attorneys are not truthful about this substantive issue.

The Pagnozzis and their dishonest attorneys play games with innocent people's lives and think that they are clever. They are not. They are sociopaths; profoundly disturbed individuals.

My experience is important consumer information for every tenant in my building, every broker in town, and every potential tenant.

At any time, even now, the Pagnozzis and their dishonest associates could fabricate a story to "milk" any other tenant for thousands of dollars by making up stories, as in my case.

If you think about it, it is a pretty good criminal scheme for dishonest landlords.

Hire a dishonest attorney like Nino Falcone, make up a story about a tenant doing damage to your building (the lies can be as outrageous as tampons are not "flushable" ), get a judge like Judge Rodriguez to play along (Judge Rodriguez and the municipal court prosecutor have demonstrated that they will play along), lie to a few police officers, and "milk" and innocent tenant for thousands of dollars.

Alternatively, if you are a tenant and were deceived into believing that you were dealing with normal, decent people, you may be a victim of consumer fraud, and you may be able to get treble damages ( so you can move into a building with a decent landlord), and attorney's fees, as New Jersey's consumer fraud statutes apply to the outrageous conduct of landlords, too.