Friday, August 8, 2008

The makers of tampons state in their widely-published box inserts that tampons are "flushable".

Mr. Pagnozzi testified in landlord-tenant court, that several years ago, after he asked his tenants, including me, to stop flushing tampons the problem stopped.

Why am I charged with a crime, now? Why didn't the municipal court prosecutor have a meaningful conversation with me?

Surely, the municipal court prosecutor, and Judge Rodriguez, both women, do not honestly and sincerely believe the fiction that tampons are "not flushable", a lie put in Mr. Pagnozzi's mouth and that he uttered in landlord-tenant court.

Mrs. Pagnozzi and all the women in Jersey City ( including Kenneth Kim's girlfriend) do not honestly and sincerely believe that tampons are "not flushable".

How did the Pagnozzis get past probable cause?

No comments: