Lankler-personal letter full text version:

Lidya,

I was going to send you a note on the same card stock I was using for everyone else, but when you noticed this vellum paper, it occurred to me that its only fitting that your note should be different from the rest of the staff's.

To say that you are a unique person would be an enormous understatement. In my career I can't say that I've ever worked with anyone who has your tenacity and intelligence and dedication. You surely don't need me to tell you how valuable you have been to the Center and that, of course, there probably isn't a marketer in the company who is as effective as you.

But what I want you to know that I'll miss you more as a person than as a colleague. I truly have enjoyed your company. Your ability to challenge my way of thinking, the intellectual prowess you bring to the everyday, and, yes, even your ragging about my smoking and cardiovascular well being are things I'll truly miss.

I truly hope that your future proves to be as bright as you observe, and please promise that we will remain good friends.

Yours,

Andy.

Here's how Tenants Can Protect themselves:

Falcone and the Pagnozzis tried to harass me with a retro-active, compound, cumulative rent increase, of $300/month.

See page 86, of Judge Fast's book: in determining the unconscionability of a rent increase, a judge may consider ... (2) the landlord's expenses, and profitability....

I asked to see the Pagnozzis' IRS statements.

Mr. Sindoni and I analyzed the Pagnozzis' income tax statement from 2006. We developed and placed on the record, evidence that a prosecutor can use.

The attorneys at NJ Legal Services that help and supervise Mr. Sindoni are aware of the criminal conduct in my case (I talked with Jack Wind about my case against my medical school).

The Pagnozzis are under-reporting their rental income.

Overall, the Pagnozzis paid Falcone, my best guess, almost $20,000 in legal fees, so that they could place, on the record, information a prosecutor can use in a prosecution for income tax fraud.

This has nothing to do with a reasonable rent increase for me.

Moreover, the Pagnozzis paid Falcone thousands of dollars in legal fees, so that they could commit perjury, and violate "no-contact" orders. This has nothing to do with a reasonable rent increase for me.

The next time your landlord tries to harass you with an outrageous rent increase, let him know you will be asking to see his IRS statements, pursuant to Judge Fast's teachings [Judge Fast worked for the IRS].

[more detailed information to come---about how Angel Quinones, Melissa Bastos, Kenneth Kim, Mark Katelhon, and I are witnesses against the Pagnozzis in income tax fraud].

Click on the Pagnozzis income tax statement for 2006, to enlarge it and view Mr. Sindoni's hand-written comments; click on your browser's Internet "back" button to return to reading this blog.

Judge Rodriguez participated in the harassment against me. Here's how:

On 7/10/2008, Judge Rodriguez issued a verbal "no-contact" order. My public defender and I asked for a written copy of that order, that I could take home with me.

My public defender and I explained to Judge Rodriguez that my landlords are dishonest, and have lied to the police before.

Without the paperwork in my hands, to show to the police, after an episode of harassment, the situation boils down to my word against theirs. Judge Rodriguez understood that this had happened before.

Judge Rodriguez deliberately refused to give me a written "no-contact" order.

In open court, she told me that if there was a problem I should come see her directly, and that she would enforce the "no-contact" order.

For a week, I tried talking to Judge Rodriguez about protecting evidence and witnesses housed in my apartment. Deliberately, intentionally, willfully, with malice, Judge Rodriguez gave me a run-around.

Today, Saturday, 8/9/2008 in violation of the "no-contact" order, Magda Pagnozzi came to my home, rang my door-bell, and stood on my stoop with a video-camera, trying to provoke me.

Today, in violation of the "no-contact" order, Ralph Pagnozzi slashed my front door with a sharp object.

They are trying to terrorize me, and other witnesses who are scheduled to testify against them.

When the police responded, I had no written "no-contact" order to show them, and, so, they could do nothing.

Women are always told to get a written copy of a "no-contact" order, and to make copies, to have a copy at home, in their purse, and to give to family members, and friends.

What does an innocent victim like me do, when a judge like Judge Rodriguez ( and she is a woman, no less ) deliberately, knowingly, willfully, with malice, refuses to give me a written " no-contact" order, AFTER I told her (in open court) that this had happened before, and was afraid that this would happen again?

There is no doubt, Judge Rodriguez knew she was setting me up for this.

Have no fear, Judge Rodriguez will be known in the international community.

I already called a major university that is representing another woman in a case being presented to the international community, a case, that says, essentially, that "no-contact" orders, and restraining orders are worthless.

[Note: The Jersey City Housing Inspectors, and the Jersey City police know what is going on is wrong, and they are doing the best they can.

They know that Dan Riesel, a former chief prosecutor in the federal courts, is cooperating with a racist medical school to steal money from me in a federal student loan program.

They know 36 federal judges are part of this criminal scheme.

I told Ralph and Magda Pagnozzi about this in detail in February 2007; they know, too.

Lots of people know that my medical school is the school where Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic Party, and his wife, got their medical degrees. I called Howard Dean's office. He knows. I asked Mr. Dean to make a single phone call to protest the fact that there were no hearings for students. He refused.

The makers of tampons state in their widely-published box inserts that tampons are "flushable".

Mr. Pagnozzi testified in landlord-tenant court, that several years ago, after he asked his tenants, including me, to stop flushing tampons the problem stopped.

Why am I charged with a crime, now? Why didn't the municipal court prosecutor have a meaningful conversation with me?

Surely, the municipal court prosecutor, and Judge Rodriguez, both women, do not honestly and sincerely believe the fiction that tampons are "not flushable", a lie put in Mr. Pagnozzi's mouth and that he uttered in landlord-tenant court.

Mrs. Pagnozzi and all the women in Jersey City ( including Kenneth Kim's girlfriend) do not honestly and sincerely believe that tampons are "not flushable".

How did the Pagnozzis get past probable cause?

8/9/2008-Saturday.

Thank you Jersey City police officers, Kang (badge # 2743) and Rivera
(badge # 2726).

They stood in my apartment where Mr. Pagnozzi testified he stood in 2003, when he changed my locks after my room-mate, Rosenheim moved out.

I asked them, officers, Mr. Pagnozzi testified that he changed my locks in 2003, if you were standing here, changing my locks, isn't it impossible not to notice that a wall was missing. They agreed.

[Note: Apparently, my landlords are trying to excuse their harassment by claiming greed. They did not care about money.

In June 2007, Melissa Bastos, and Angel Quinones rent increase was $ 0, Kenneth Kim's rent increase was $50, my rent increase was $300. The numbers speak for themselves.

Melissa Bastos, and Angel Quinones came to court on 9/10/2007. My landlords gave them retaliatory rent increases, and other restrictions AFTER they came to court. ]



In landlord-tenant court, docket number: LT-3443-08, Ralph Pagnozzi testified that in 2003 after Asaf Rosenheim moved out of my apartment, he entered my apartment by four feet to change the locks.

The posted photograph (see the 2 foot-marker) shows that in 2003 while changing the locks, Mr. Pagnozzi could not have missed seeing a wall that had been removed.

Please note especially that my door opens inward. Mr. Pagnozzi could not have changed the locks unless he entered my apartment, as he testified.

Click on the photograph to engage it, to return to reading the blog, click on your Internet browser's "Back" button".

Mr. Pagnozzi and his attorneys are attempting to create a fiction
(coming up from Mr. Rosenheim's letters) that Asaf Roseheim left my apartment in good condition, and that after he moved out I removed a wall, causing damage to the apartment.

[The Pagnozzis' building is not damaged. It is DETERIORATING because they do not do the repairs and upkeep. I will post photographs, and you can see for yourself].

Mr. Pagnozzi, assisted by his attorneys, are engaged in a criminal scheme to "milk" me of money, and falsely label me as a criminal.

There are a number of witnesses and physical evidence that demonstrate this dividing wall was not present when I moved in 2003, in addition to Mr. Pagnozzi's testimony.

How did the Pagnozzzis and their attorney get past probable cause? Why didn't the prosecutor at the municipal court have a meaningful conversation with me?

The Housing Inspectors have already inspected my apartment twice. They know the Pagnozzis and their attorneys are not truthful about this substantive issue.

The Pagnozzis and their dishonest attorneys play games with innocent people's lives and think that they are clever. They are not. They are sociopaths; profoundly disturbed individuals.

My experience is important consumer information for every tenant in my building, every broker in town, and every potential tenant.

At any time, even now, the Pagnozzis and their dishonest associates could fabricate a story to "milk" any other tenant for thousands of dollars by making up stories, as in my case.

If you think about it, it is a pretty good criminal scheme for dishonest landlords.

Hire a dishonest attorney like Nino Falcone, make up a story about a tenant doing damage to your building (the lies can be as outrageous as tampons are not "flushable" ), get a judge like Judge Rodriguez to play along (Judge Rodriguez and the municipal court prosecutor have demonstrated that they will play along), lie to a few police officers, and "milk" and innocent tenant for thousands of dollars.

Alternatively, if you are a tenant and were deceived into believing that you were dealing with normal, decent people, you may be a victim of consumer fraud, and you may be able to get treble damages ( so you can move into a building with a decent landlord), and attorney's fees, as New Jersey's consumer fraud statutes apply to the outrageous conduct of landlords, too.